SEC vs. Ripple: Is the regulator moving to strike every single witness in the lawsuit?

John E.Deaton Analisa Torres James K.Filan Usa San Francisco UPS XRP Ripple SEC U.S.District

07.07.2022 - 15:45

Reading now: 787

ambcrypto.com:

The lawsuit between the American regulators (SEC) and the San Francisco-based fintech firm Ripple continues to see new developments. This time the topic of discussion is Amici Curiae, which John E. Deaton filed for. He further asked the U.S District Judge Analisa Torres to consider the views of XRP holders.

Since then, both sides took turns representing their respective views.

A week ago, the Defendant filed a motion to oppose the SEC’s effort to seal its response to the amici. The formerargued that the SEC’s position is “antithetical to the right of the public to have access to substantive legal arguments in a case of widespread interest.”

But it’s not over yet as the Plaintiff, on 7 July filed a response to counter this narrative.

<p lang=«en» dir=«ltr» xml:lang=«en»>#XRPCommunity #SECGov v. #Ripple #XRP The SEC has sought permission to file one omnibus (big) motion to exclude or limit expert testimony, up to 120 pages long. Ripple Defendants do not object provided that they be allowed the same page limit for their response in opposition. pic.twitter.com/haa4Mr7XU1

— James K. Filan

Read more on ambcrypto.com

All news from ambcrypto.com

About this in other media

Coinbase Criticizes US SEC, Crypto Community Criticizes Coinbase over Insider Trading, and CFTC Chimes In cryptonews.com /1 year ago

SEC listing 9 tokens as securities in insider trading case 'could have broad implications' — CFTC cointelegraph.com /1 year ago

Emmer: SEC using enforcement to ‘unconstitutionally expand its jurisdiction’ ambcrypto.com /1 year ago

The website gocryptonft.com is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.