Pro-Ripple lawyer predicts prolonged legal battle, hints at settlement factors

cointelegraph.com:

Pro-Ripple lawyer John Deaton has said he expects a lengthy legal process for the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) v Ripple case, possibly lasting a year. Deaton suggests that a settlement may only be considered if Coinbase's motion to dismiss (MTD) the SEC's case against it is successful. 

In a detailed post on X (formerly known as Twitter), Deaton discussed the lack of serious settlement talks between Ripple, its executives and the SEC. He mentioned the SEC's desire for a $770 million penalty and explained the complexities of the penalty phase involving various legal processes.

In his words,

He explained that the penalty phase is a detailed process, akin to a second legal case, involving depositions, document requests, emails, financial records, contracts and on-demand liquidity (ODL) transactions. Deaton suggests that Ripple might aim to reduce the $770 million penalty by excluding ODL transactions and cutting down on additional expenses. He points to the LBRY case where the SEC initially pursued $23 million, but after eight months of litigation, it led to a $130,000 fine.

As I said on @CryptoLawUS TV yesterday with @attorneyjeremy1 and Thien-Vu, I do not believe there has been a single serious conversation regarding settlement between @Ripple @bgarlinghouse @chrislarsensf and the @SECGov.

The SEC is pissed and embarrassed and wants $770M worth… https://t.co/kcXvsrPgaa

Creating a timeframe, he commented,

Deaton connected Ripple's case outcome with another significant lawsuit, stating that if Coinbase succeeds in its motion to dismiss, the SEC may shift its stance on cryptocurrencies and consider a settlement with Ripple. However, if Coinbase's MTD fails, he foresees no settlement.

Related: Coinbase disputes SEC’s