BTC Mining Report Draws Criticism

blockchain.news:

The New York Times' recent report on Bitcoin mining, «The Real-World Costs of the Digital Race for Bitcoin,» has been met with criticism from BTC proponents. The article claims that Bitcoin mining has a «voracious» appetite and uses as much energy as all residences in New York City. However, some analysts have pointed out that the article cherry-picks data and neglects the increasing use of renewable energy in the mining sector.

Bitcoin environmental, social, and governance (ESG) analyst, Daniel Batten, said that the article exaggerates the fossil fuel use of BTC miners and uses incomplete datasets to support its thesis. He also noted that some Bitcoin miners in the United States and Canada use 90% sustainable energy to fuel their mining activities, but the NYT article focuses on the sites least backed by renewable energy.

Bitcoin proponent, Troy Cross, criticized the article for using «marginal emissions accounting» and selectively applying it only for carbon emissions, not generation. Dennis Porter, CEO of the Satoshi Act Fund, also noted an error in the article's initial reporting, where the wrong town was named for a BTC mining facility in Texas.

BTC mining firm Riot's vice president of research, Pierre Rochard, accused the NYT of using «fictitious fractional-reserve carbon accounting» and «cooking the books to fabricate emissions.» Meanwhile, another Twitter user believed that the article was fear-mongering.

Despite the debate on Bitcoin mining's energy consumption, it remains significant for the blockchain. Mining is used to verify transactions, make it decentralized, and add a layer of security. According to the Bitcoin Mining Council's Q4 2022 report, the Bitcoin network is already a leader in