Institutional investors were souring on cryptocurrencies even before this week. The sudden downfall of Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX.com may have permanently damaged their prospects of being included in mainstream portfolios. While plenty of industry die-hards remain, many professional money managers are saying the case for crypto as a portfolio diversifier or digital gold has been debunked. The losses are too great and the market structure is too risky, they say.
“What’s become clear is it will not find a home in institutional asset allocation," said Hani Redha, a multi-asset portfolio manager at Pinebridge Investments in London. “There was a period when it was being considered as a potential asset class that every investor should have in their strategic asset allocation and that’s off the table entirely."
The implosions and scandals of the past few months have laid waste to the key arguments of crypto boosters, and all but obliterated the notion of Bitcoin as safe haven in turbulent times. But none of those events—from the TerraUSD collapse to the Celsius bankruptcy—were as damning as the revelation that even FTX, until recently considered one of the most blue-chip names in crypto, was unsound.
The FTX collapse is “raising questions on the viability of the crypto ecosystem," said Salman Ahmed, chief investment strategist at Fidelity International, which oversees $646 billion from London. “It was always tough to make a case for including crypto, but the set up has come under more pressure."
His firm launched an Bitcoin exchange-traded product in February, aimed at professional European investors. It has lost about 55% since inception. Just a year ago, crypto mania was at its height and Bitcoin had topped $67,000. In
Read more on livemint.com